Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From International cyber law: interactive toolkit
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added sources from case study 17 + oscola editing)
(added references from scenario 18 + oscola editing)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*Ian Brownlie, ''[http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198251583.001.0001/acprof-9780198251583 International Law and the Use of Force by States]'' (OUP 1963).
 
*Ian Brownlie, ''[http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198251583.001.0001/acprof-9780198251583 International Law and the Use of Force by States]'' (OUP 1963).
 
* Oliver Corten, ''The Law against War'' (Hart Pub 2010).
 
* Oliver Corten, ''The Law against War'' (Hart Pub 2010).
  +
*Emily Crawford, [https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678495.001.0001/acprof-9780199678495 ''Identifying the Enemy: Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict''] (OUP 2015).
 
* James Crawford, ''Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law'' (OUP 2012).
 
* James Crawford, ''Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law'' (OUP 2012).
 
* James Crawford, ''State Responsibility: The General Part'' (CUP 2013).
 
* James Crawford, ''State Responsibility: The General Part'' (CUP 2013).
Line 34: Line 35:
 
*Frederic Dopagne, ‘Sanctions and Countermeasures by International Organizations’ in Richard Collins and Nigel White (eds) ''International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy'' (Routledge 2011).
 
*Frederic Dopagne, ‘Sanctions and Countermeasures by International Organizations’ in Richard Collins and Nigel White (eds) ''International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy'' (Routledge 2011).
 
*Tristan Ferraro and Lindsey Cameron, ‘Article 2: Application of the Convention’ in ICRC (ed), ''[https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316755709 Commentary on the First Geneva Convention]'' (CUP 2016).
 
*Tristan Ferraro and Lindsey Cameron, ‘Article 2: Application of the Convention’ in ICRC (ed), ''[https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316755709 Commentary on the First Geneva Convention]'' (CUP 2016).
  +
*Hans-Peter Gasser and Knut Dörmann, ‘Protection of Civilian Population’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), ''[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199658800.001.0001/law-9780199658800 The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law]'' (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
 
*Robin Geiss and Henning Lahmann, ‘Freedom and Security in Cyberspace: Shifting the Focus Away from Military Responses Towards Non-Forcible Countermeasures and Collective Threat-Prevention’ in Katharina Ziolkowski (ed), ''Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace'' (NATO CCD COE 2013).
 
*Robin Geiss and Henning Lahmann, ‘Freedom and Security in Cyberspace: Shifting the Focus Away from Military Responses Towards Non-Forcible Countermeasures and Collective Threat-Prevention’ in Katharina Ziolkowski (ed), ''Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace'' (NATO CCD COE 2013).
 
*Terry D. Gill, ‘Non-intervention in the Cyber Context’ in Katharina Ziolkowski (ed), ''Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace'' (NATO CCD COE 2013).
 
*Terry D. Gill, ‘Non-intervention in the Cyber Context’ in Katharina Ziolkowski (ed), ''Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace'' (NATO CCD COE 2013).
Line 39: Line 41:
 
*Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, ‘[https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e443 Warships]’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated October 2015)
 
*Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, ‘[https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e443 Warships]’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated October 2015)
 
*Albert J. Hoffmann, ‘[https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1199 Freedom of Navigation]’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated April 2011).
 
*Albert J. Hoffmann, ‘[https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1199 Freedom of Navigation]’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated April 2011).
  +
*Knut Ipsen, ‘Combatants and Non-Combatants’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), <i>[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199658800.001.0001/law-9780199658800 The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law]</i> (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
 
*Jan K. Kleffner, ‘Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), ''[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199658800.001.0001/law-9780199658800 The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law]'' (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
 
*Jan K. Kleffner, ‘Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), ''[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199658800.001.0001/law-9780199658800 The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law]'' (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
 
*Jeff Kosseff, ‘Retorsion as a Response to Ongoing Cyber Operations’ in Taťána Jančárková et al (eds), ''20/20 Vision: The Next Decade'' (NATO CCD COE 2020).
 
*Jeff Kosseff, ‘Retorsion as a Response to Ongoing Cyber Operations’ in Taťána Jančárková et al (eds), ''20/20 Vision: The Next Decade'' (NATO CCD COE 2020).
Line 45: Line 48:
 
*Philip Kunig, ‘[https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1434 Prohibition of Intervention]’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated April 2008).
 
*Philip Kunig, ‘[https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1434 Prohibition of Intervention]’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated April 2008).
 
*Franck Latty, ‘Actions and Omissions’ in James Crawford et al (eds), ''The Law of International Responsibility'' (OUP 2010).
 
*Franck Latty, ‘Actions and Omissions’ in James Crawford et al (eds), ''The Law of International Responsibility'' (OUP 2010).
  +
*Nils Melzer, ‘Cyber Operations and ''jus in bello''’ in Kerstin Vignard (ed), <i>Confronting Cyberconflict</i> (UNIDIR 2011).
 
*Georg Nolte and Albrecht Randelzhofer, ‘Article 51’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), ''The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary'' (OUP 2012).
 
*Georg Nolte and Albrecht Randelzhofer, ‘Article 51’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), ''The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary'' (OUP 2012).
 
*Anne Peters, ‘Article 25’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), ''[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199639762.001.0001/law-9780199639762 The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary]'' (3rd edn, OUP 2012).
 
*Anne Peters, ‘Article 25’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), ''[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199639762.001.0001/law-9780199639762 The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary]'' (3rd edn, OUP 2012).
  +
*Jody Prescott, ‘Direct Participation in Cyber Hostilities: Terms of Reference for Like-Minded States?’ in Christian Czosseck, Rain Ottis and Katharina Ziolkowski (eds), <i>4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict</i> (NATO CCD COE 2012).
 
*Przemysław Roguski, ‘Collective Countermeasures in Cyberspace: ''Lex lata,'' Progressive Development or a Bad Idea?’ in Taťána Jančárková et al (eds), ''20/20 Vision: The Next Decade'' (NATO CCD COE 2020).
 
*Przemysław Roguski, ‘Collective Countermeasures in Cyberspace: ''Lex lata,'' Progressive Development or a Bad Idea?’ in Taťána Jančárková et al (eds), ''20/20 Vision: The Next Decade'' (NATO CCD COE 2020).
  +
*Tassilo Singer, ‘Update to Revolving Door 2.0 – the Extension of the Period for Direct Participation in Hostilities Due to Autonomous Cyber Weapons’ in Henry Rõigas et al (eds), <i>9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Defending the Core </i>(NATO CCD COE 2017).
 
*Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 37: Prohibition of Perfidy’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), ''New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts'' (Brill 1982).
 
*Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 37: Prohibition of Perfidy’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), ''New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts'' (Brill 1982).
 
*Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 38: Recognized Emblems’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), ''New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts'' (Brill 1982).
 
*Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 38: Recognized Emblems’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), ''New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts'' (Brill 1982).
Line 53: Line 59:
 
*Yoshifumi Tanaka, ‘Navigational Rights and Freedoms’ in Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elfernik, Karen Scott and Tim Stephens (eds), ''[https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/law/9780198715481.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198715481 The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea]'' (OUP 2015).
 
*Yoshifumi Tanaka, ‘Navigational Rights and Freedoms’ in Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elfernik, Karen Scott and Tim Stephens (eds), ''[https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/law/9780198715481.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198715481 The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea]'' (OUP 2015).
 
*Silja Vöneky, ‘[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1375 Analogy in International Law]’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008).
 
*Silja Vöneky, ‘[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1375 Analogy in International Law]’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008).
  +
*Sean Watts, ‘The Notion of Combatancy in Cyber Warfare’, in Christian Czosseck, Rain Ottis and Katharina Ziolkowski (eds), <i>4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict</i> (NATO CCD COE 2012).
 
*Rüdiger Wolfrum, ‘Obligation of Result Versus Obligation of Conduct: Some Thoughts About the Implementation of International Obligations’ in Mahnoush H Arsanjani et al, ''Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of Michael Reisman'' (Brill 2010).
 
*Rüdiger Wolfrum, ‘Obligation of Result Versus Obligation of Conduct: Some Thoughts About the Implementation of International Obligations’ in Mahnoush H Arsanjani et al, ''Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of Michael Reisman'' (Brill 2010).
 
*Katja Ziegler, ‘[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1398 Domaine Réservé]’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated April 2013).
 
*Katja Ziegler, ‘[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1398 Domaine Réservé]’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), ''Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law'' (OUP 2008, updated April 2013).
Line 98: Line 105:
 
*Kubo Mačák, ‘[https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223714000260 Military Objectives 2.0: The Case for Interpreting Computer Data as Objects under International Humanitarian Law]’ (2015) 48 Isr L Rev 55.
 
*Kubo Mačák, ‘[https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223714000260 Military Objectives 2.0: The Case for Interpreting Computer Data as Objects under International Humanitarian Law]’ (2015) 48 Isr L Rev 55.
 
* Peter Margulies, '[https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1687488/05Margulies-Depaginated.pdf Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology's Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility]' (2013) 14 MJIL.
 
* Peter Margulies, '[https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1687488/05Margulies-Depaginated.pdf Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology's Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility]' (2013) 14 MJIL.
  +
*John Merriam, ‘Affirmative Target Identification, Operationalizing the Principle of Distinction for U.S. Warfighters’ (2015) 56 Virginia JIL 83.
 
*Marko Milanovic, ‘[http://www.harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/561Milanovic.pdf Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age]’ (2015) 56/1 Harv Int'l LJ.
 
*Marko Milanovic, ‘[http://www.harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/561Milanovic.pdf Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age]’ (2015) 56/1 Harv Int'l LJ.
 
*Noam Neuman, ‘Challenges in the Interpretation and Application of the Principle of Distinction During Ground Operations in Urban Areas’ (2018) 51 VJTL 807.
 
*Noam Neuman, ‘Challenges in the Interpretation and Application of the Principle of Distinction During Ground Operations in Urban Areas’ (2018) 51 VJTL 807.
 
*Sean K Price, ‘[https://harvardnsj.org/2020/02/perfidy-in-cyberspace-the-requirement-for-human-confidence/ Perfidy in Cyberspace: The Requirement for Human Confidence]’ (2020) Harv. Nat'l Sec. J. Online.
 
*Sean K Price, ‘[https://harvardnsj.org/2020/02/perfidy-in-cyberspace-the-requirement-for-human-confidence/ Perfidy in Cyberspace: The Requirement for Human Confidence]’ (2020) Harv. Nat'l Sec. J. Online.
 
*Darien Pun, ‘[https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krw014 Rethinking Espionage in the Modern Era]’ (2017) 18 Chicago JIL 353.
 
*Darien Pun, ‘[https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krw014 Rethinking Espionage in the Modern Era]’ (2017) 18 Chicago JIL 353.
*Barrie Sander, ‘[https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmz003 Democracy Under The Influence: Paradigms of State Responsibility for Cyber Influence Operations on Elections]’ (2019) 18 Chinese Journal of International Law 1.
+
*Barrie Sander, ‘[https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmz003 Democracy Under The Influence: Paradigms of State Responsibility for Cyber Influence Operations on Elections]’ (2019) 18 Chinese JIL 1.
 
*Dietrich Schindler, ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’ (1979) 163 RdC 117.
 
*Dietrich Schindler, ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’ (1979) 163 RdC 117.
 
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘Computer Network Attack and Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework’ (1999) 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 885.
 
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘Computer Network Attack and Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework’ (1999) 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 885.
  +
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘The Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities: A Critical Analysis’ (2010) 1 Harvard National Security Journal 5.
 
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘Below the Threshold Cyber Operations: The Countermeasures Response Option and International Law’ (2014) 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 697.
 
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘Below the Threshold Cyber Operations: The Countermeasures Response Option and International Law’ (2014) 54 Virginia Journal of International Law 697.
 
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘[https://puc.overheid.nl/mrt/doc/PUC_248137_11/ International Cyber Norms: Reflections on the Path Ahead]’ (2018) 111 Netherlands Military Law Review 12.
 
*Michael N Schmitt, ‘[https://puc.overheid.nl/mrt/doc/PUC_248137_11/ International Cyber Norms: Reflections on the Path Ahead]’ (2018) 111 Netherlands Military Law Review 12.
Line 131: Line 140:
 
*International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171.
 
*International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171.
 
*[https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights] (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3.
 
*[https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights] (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3.
  +
*ICRC, <i>[https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/icrc-002-0990.pdf Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law]</i> (ICRC 2009).
 
*NATO, ''[https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm Warsaw Summit Communiqué]'' (9 July 2016).
 
*NATO, ''[https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm Warsaw Summit Communiqué]'' (9 July 2016).
 
*Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, ''[https://www.osce.org/pc/227281?download=true Decision No. 1202, OSCE Confidence-Building Measures to Reduce the Risks of Conflict Stemming from the Use of Information and Communication Technologies]'' (Permanent Council, 10 March 2016) PC.DEC/1202.
 
*Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, ''[https://www.osce.org/pc/227281?download=true Decision No. 1202, OSCE Confidence-Building Measures to Reduce the Risks of Conflict Stemming from the Use of Information and Communication Technologies]'' (Permanent Council, 10 March 2016) PC.DEC/1202.

Revision as of 13:52, 6 September 2021

Bibliography.jpg

Books and monographs

Contributions to edited collections

  • Russell Buchan, ‘The International Legal Regulation of State-Sponsored Cyber Espionage’ (2016) in Anna-Maria Osula and Henry Rõigas (eds) International Cyber Norms: Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives (NATO CCD COE Publications, Tallinn 2016).
  • Lindsey Cameron et al, ‘Article 3: Conflicts Not of an International Character’ in ICRC (ed), Commentary on the First Geneva Convention (CUP 2016).
  • Andrew Clapham, ‘Concept of International Armed Conflict’ in Andrew Clapham, Paola Gaeta, and Marco Sassòli (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary (OUP 2015).
  • Gary P. Corn and Peter P. Pascucci, ‘The Law of Armed Conflict Implications of Covered or Concealed Cyber Operations: Perfidy, Ruses, and the Principle of Passive Distinction’ in Ronald T. P. Alcala and Eric T. Jensen (eds), The Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Law of Armed Conflict (OUP 2019).
  • Jean D’Aspremont, ‘Persona Non Grata’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008).
  • Oliver Dörr and Albrecht Randelzhofer, ‘Article 2(4)’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (OUP 2012).
  • Frederic Dopagne, ‘Sanctions and Countermeasures by International Organizations’ in Richard Collins and Nigel White (eds) International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy (Routledge 2011).
  • Tristan Ferraro and Lindsey Cameron, ‘Article 2: Application of the Convention’ in ICRC (ed), Commentary on the First Geneva Convention (CUP 2016).
  • Hans-Peter Gasser and Knut Dörmann, ‘Protection of Civilian Population’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
  • Robin Geiss and Henning Lahmann, ‘Freedom and Security in Cyberspace: Shifting the Focus Away from Military Responses Towards Non-Forcible Countermeasures and Collective Threat-Prevention’ in Katharina Ziolkowski (ed), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace (NATO CCD COE 2013).
  • Terry D. Gill, ‘Non-intervention in the Cyber Context’ in Katharina Ziolkowski (ed), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace (NATO CCD COE 2013).
  • Douglas Guilfoyle, ‘The High Seas’ (2015) in Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elfernik, Karen Scott and Tim Stephens (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015).
  • Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, ‘Warships’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008, updated October 2015)
  • Albert J. Hoffmann, ‘Freedom of Navigation’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008, updated April 2011).
  • Knut Ipsen, ‘Combatants and Non-Combatants’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
  • Jan K. Kleffner, ‘Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law’ in Dieter Fleck (ed), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (3rd edn, OUP 2013).
  • Jeff Kosseff, ‘Retorsion as a Response to Ongoing Cyber Operations’ in Taťána Jančárková et al (eds), 20/20 Vision: The Next Decade (NATO CCD COE 2020).
  • Natalie Klein, ‘Maritime Security’ in Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elfernik, Karen Scott and Tim Stephens (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015).
  • Doris König, ‘Flag of Ships’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008, updated April 2009).
  • Philip Kunig, ‘Prohibition of Intervention’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008, updated April 2008).
  • Franck Latty, ‘Actions and Omissions’ in James Crawford et al (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010).
  • Nils Melzer, ‘Cyber Operations and jus in bello’ in Kerstin Vignard (ed), Confronting Cyberconflict (UNIDIR 2011).
  • Georg Nolte and Albrecht Randelzhofer, ‘Article 51’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (OUP 2012).
  • Anne Peters, ‘Article 25’ in Bruno Simma et al (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd edn, OUP 2012).
  • Jody Prescott, ‘Direct Participation in Cyber Hostilities: Terms of Reference for Like-Minded States?’ in Christian Czosseck, Rain Ottis and Katharina Ziolkowski (eds), 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (NATO CCD COE 2012).
  • Przemysław Roguski, ‘Collective Countermeasures in Cyberspace: Lex lata, Progressive Development or a Bad Idea?’ in Taťána Jančárková et al (eds), 20/20 Vision: The Next Decade (NATO CCD COE 2020).
  • Tassilo Singer, ‘Update to Revolving Door 2.0 – the Extension of the Period for Direct Participation in Hostilities Due to Autonomous Cyber Weapons’ in Henry Rõigas et al (eds), 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Defending the Core (NATO CCD COE 2017).
  • Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 37: Prohibition of Perfidy’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts (Brill 1982).
  • Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 38: Recognized Emblems’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts (Brill 1982).
  • Waldemar A Solf, ‘Article 39: Emblems of Nationality’ in Michael Bothe et al (eds), New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts (Brill 1982).
  • Yoshifumi Tanaka, ‘Navigational Rights and Freedoms’ in Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elfernik, Karen Scott and Tim Stephens (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015).
  • Silja Vöneky, ‘Analogy in International Law’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008).
  • Sean Watts, ‘The Notion of Combatancy in Cyber Warfare’, in Christian Czosseck, Rain Ottis and Katharina Ziolkowski (eds), 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (NATO CCD COE 2012).
  • Rüdiger Wolfrum, ‘Obligation of Result Versus Obligation of Conduct: Some Thoughts About the Implementation of International Obligations’ in Mahnoush H Arsanjani et al, Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of Michael Reisman (Brill 2010).
  • Katja Ziegler, ‘Domaine Réservé’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008, updated April 2013).

Edited books and reference texts

Journal articles

International treaties, reports and other public documents

Blog posts and other online sources