Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scenario 02: Cyber espionage against government departments"

From International cyber law: interactive toolkit
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
The topic is an important one and the scenario is well-written. Believe it needs to be fleshed-out somewhat.Corrections are in the text, comments and questions below.
 
The topic is an important one and the scenario is well-written. Believe it needs to be fleshed-out somewhat.Corrections are in the text, comments and questions below.
 
(1)"an email server and several other servers belonging to its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) have been infiltrated" - where are the servers located? If we're testing diplomatic law, important to note that the servers are both on state territory and in diplomatic / consular missions abroad.
 
  
(2)
+
(1) Keyword "privacy" added because of the personnel emails being hacked and personal details published: privacy rights are implicated.
 +
 
 +
(2)"an email server and several other servers belonging to its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) have been infiltrated" - where are the servers located? If we're testing diplomatic law, important to note that the servers are both on state territory and in diplomatic / consular missions abroad.
 +
 
 +
(3) "Nobody claims responsibility for the attack immediately after the MFA's discovery of the incident and publication of the fact that it has occurred." - is the addition ok? Otherwise - why would anyone claim responsibility, if there's been no public acknowledgement?
 +
 
 +
(3)

Revision as of 07:22, 5 November 2018

This is a sample comment. Kubomacak (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments and questions in addition to text edits

The topic is an important one and the scenario is well-written. Believe it needs to be fleshed-out somewhat.Corrections are in the text, comments and questions below.

(1) Keyword "privacy" added because of the personnel emails being hacked and personal details published: privacy rights are implicated.

(2)"an email server and several other servers belonging to its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) have been infiltrated" - where are the servers located? If we're testing diplomatic law, important to note that the servers are both on state territory and in diplomatic / consular missions abroad.

(3) "Nobody claims responsibility for the attack immediately after the MFA's discovery of the incident and publication of the fact that it has occurred." - is the addition ok? Otherwise - why would anyone claim responsibility, if there's been no public acknowledgement?

(3)