Difference between revisions of "Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(incorporating review DW)
 
=== Bibliography ===
* SM Bellovin, S Landau and HS Lin, ‘Limiting‘[https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/3/1/59/3097802 Limiting the undesiredUndesired impactImpact of cyberCyber weaponsWeapons: technicalTechnical requirementsRequirements and policyPolicy implications’Implications]’ (2017) 3(1) Journal of Cybersecurity 59.
* D Blake and J Imburgia, ‘“Bloodless‘[https://ssrn.com/abstract=1850831 “Bloodless Weapons”? The needNeed to conductConduct legalLegal reviewReview of certainCertain capabilitiesCapabilities and the implicationsImplications of definingDefining themThem as “weapons”’“Weapons”]’, (2010) 66 Air Force Law Review 157.
* V Boulanin and M Verbruggen, [https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/article_36_report_1712.pdf <i>Article 36 Reviews: Dealing with the Challenges Posed by Emerging Technologies</i>] (SIPRI 2017).
* GD Brown and AO Metcalf, ‘[http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Easier-Said-than-Done.pdf Easier Said Than Done: Legal Reviews of Cyber Weapons]’ (2014) 7 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 115.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu