Difference between revisions of "Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Bibliography: Added complete bibliography
(→‎Bibliography: fixing bibliography)
(→‎Bibliography: Added complete bibliography)
=== Bibliography ===
* SMSteven Bellovin, SSusan Landau and HSHerbert Lin, ‘[https://academic.oup.com/cybersecurity/article/3/1/59/3097802 Limiting the Undesired Impact of Cyber Weapons: Technical Requirements and Policy Implications]’ (2017) 3(1) Journal of Cybersecurity 59.
*William H Boothby, ''Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict'' (OUP 2016).   
* DDuncan Blake and JJoseph Imburgia, ‘[https://ssrn.com/abstract=1850831 “Bloodless Weapons”? The Need to Conduct Legal Review of Certain Capabilities and the Implications of Defining Them as “Weapons”]’, (2010) 66 Air Force Law Review 157.
* VVincent Boulanin and MMaaike Verbruggen, [https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/article_36_report_1712.pdf <i>Article 36 Reviews: Dealing with the Challenges Posed by Emerging Technologies</i>] (SIPRI 2017).
* GDGary Brown and AOAndrew Metcalf, ‘[http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Easier-Said-than-Done.pdf Easier Said Than Done: Legal Reviews of Cyber Weapons]’ (2014) 7 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 115.
* Robin Geiss, ‘The Obligation to Respect and to Ensure Respect for the Conventions’ in Andrew Clapham, Paola Gaeta and Marco Sassòli (eds), ''The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary'' (OUP 2015).
*MNMichael N Schmitt (ed), ''Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations'' (CUP 2017).
* DDavid Wallace, ‘[https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdf/TP%2011_2018.pdf Cyber Weapon Reviews under International Humanitarian Law: A Critical Analysis]’ (2018) Tallinn Paper No. 11.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu