Difference between revisions of "Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
The analysis in this scenario examines State obligations to conduct a weapons review with respect to cyber capabilities during peacetime. In particular, it considers whether malware capable of physical destruction qualifies as a weapon that is inherently indiscriminate and therefore prohibited by IHL.
 
{{#lst:Legal review of cyber weapons|Definition}}
In the present scenario, the malware developed by State A would qualify as a “cyber weapon” due to its ability to produce physical destruction, which is an effect that qualifies as “violence against the adversary”.<ref>Art 49(1) AP I.</ref> State A would accordingly be under a duty to ensure that the use of this malware complies with its international obligations. This is so irrespective of whether State A is currently involved in any armed conflict or not. If State A has ratified Additional Protocol I, its duties would additionally extend to conducting a formal legal review, which would include the assessment of the malware’s compliance with all applicable rules of international law.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu