Circumstances precluding wrongfulness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6:
! scope="col" style="background-color:#ffffaa;"| Circumstances precluding wrongfulness
|-
|A specific cyber-relation action or omission will only constitute an internationally wrongful act in the absence of [[Circumstances precluding wrongfulness|circumstances precluding its wrongfulness]].<ref>Cf. Articles on State Responsibility, commentary to Part One, chapter V, para. 1 (“The existence in a given case of a circumstance precluding wrongfulness ... provides a shield against an otherwise well-founded claim for the breach of an international obligation”).</ref>
The wrongfulness of specific conduct is precluded if one of the following conditions is met:
|
Revision as of 10:18, 20 September 2018
Definition
Circumstances precluding wrongfulness |
---|
A specific cyber-relation action or omission will only constitute an internationally wrongful act in the absence of circumstances precluding its wrongfulness.[1]
The wrongfulness of specific conduct is precluded if one of the following conditions is met:
|
Appendixes
See also
Notes and references
- ↑ Cf. Articles on State Responsibility, commentary to Part One, chapter V, para. 1 (“The existence in a given case of a circumstance precluding wrongfulness ... provides a shield against an otherwise well-founded claim for the breach of an international obligation”).
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 20.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 21.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Arts 22 and 49–54.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 23.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 24.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 25.
Bibliography and further reading
- MN Schmitt (ed), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (CUP 2017)
- Etc.