Circumstances precluding wrongfulness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=== Bibliography and further reading === |
=== Bibliography and further reading === |
||
<!-- |
|||
* MN Schmitt (ed), ''Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations'' (CUP 2017) |
* MN Schmitt (ed), ''Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations'' (CUP 2017) |
||
* Etc. |
* Etc. |
||
--> |
|||
[[Category:Legal concepts]] |
Revision as of 06:08, 16 October 2018
Definition
Circumstances precluding wrongfulness |
---|
A specific cyber-relation action or omission will only constitute an internationally wrongful act in the absence of circumstances precluding its wrongfulness.[1]
The wrongfulness of specific conduct is precluded if one of the following conditions is met:
|
Appendixes
See also
Notes and references
- ↑ Cf. Articles on State Responsibility, commentary to Part One, chapter V, para. 1 (“The existence in a given case of a circumstance precluding wrongfulness ... provides a shield against an otherwise well-founded claim for the breach of an international obligation”).
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 20.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 21.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Arts 22 and 49–54.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 23.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 24.
- ↑ Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 25.