Diplomatic and consular law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(editing references) |
||
Line 9:
! scope="col" style="background-color:#ffffaa;" | Inviolability of documents and archives of diplomatic missions and consular posts
|-
|[[File:Maki-embassy-15.svg|left|frameless|200x200px]]Diplomatic and consular law protects the inviolability of documents and archives of diplomatic missions and consular posts.<ref>Art. 24 VCDR; Art. 33 VCCR.</ref> This includes any official correspondence, whether in electronic or paper form.<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822524 Tallinn Manual 2.0], commentary to rule 41, para
|}<section end=Inviolability/>
Line 18:
! scope="col" style="background-color:#ffffaa;" | Premises of the mission
|-
|[[File:Maki-building-15.svg|left|frameless|200x200px]]Article 41 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) provides that “it is the duty of all persons enjoying [privileges and immunities according to the Convention] to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State”.<ref>
|}<section end=Premises/>
Line 27:
! scope="col" style="background-color:#ffffaa;" | Persona non grata
|-
|[[File:Maki-fence-15.svg|left|frameless|200x200px]]Apart from primary rules which can be violated by the sending State’s conduct, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations also applies to the response of the receiving State. The sending State’s diplomats in the receiving State enjoy an immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving State.<ref>
The declaration as <i>persona non grata</i> is a specific remedy under the VCDR.<ref>[https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/64/064-19800524-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf <i>United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran</i>], United States v Iran, Judgment, ICGJ 124 (ICJ 1980), 24 May 1980, paragraph 85.</ref> However, this remedy is not the only one available; if the sending State's operation amounts to an internationally wrongful act, the receiving State could possibly invoke [[countermeasures]] in its response.<ref>J D’Aspremont, ‘[http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e974 Persona Non Grata]’, in R Wolfrum (ed), <i>Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law</i> (OUP 2008) (updated January 2009), para. 16.</ref>
|
Revision as of 17:43, 26 November 2018
Overview
The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations are considered to be broadly reflective of customary international law.[1] Therefore, even if a State had not ratified these Conventions, the rules analysed below would still apply to its diplomatic and consular relations.
Inviolability of documents and archives of diplomatic missions and consular posts
Inviolability of documents and archives of diplomatic missions and consular posts |
---|
Premises of the mission
Premises of the mission |
---|
Persona non grata
Persona non grata |
---|
The declaration as persona non grata is a specific remedy under the VCDR.[13] However, this remedy is not the only one available; if the sending State's operation amounts to an internationally wrongful act, the receiving State could possibly invoke countermeasures in its response.[14] |
Appendixes
See also
Notes and references
- ↑ See, for example, J Wouters, S Duquet, and K Meuwissen, “The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations” in AF Cooper, J Heine, and R Thakur (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (OUP 2013) 510 (noting that VCDR’s and VCCR’s main provisions have acquired customary status); ICJ, United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran [1980] ICJ Rep 3, 31–32 [62] (noting that the relevant obligations under the two treaties are “also obligations under general international law”).
- ↑ Art. 24 VCDR; Art. 33 VCCR.
- ↑ Tallinn Manual 2.0, commentary to rule 41, para 3.
- ↑ Tallinn Manual 2.0, commentary to rule 41, para. 11.
- ↑ Art. 41 (1) VCDR.
- ↑ Art. 41 (3) VCDR.
- ↑ Art. 31 (1) (d) VCDR.
- ↑ See, eg, UK, Official Secrets Act 1911, s. 1; US, 18 USC §792–799.
- ↑ Cf. D Pun, ‘Rethinking Espionage in the Modern Era’ (2017) 18 Chicago JIL 353, 368; see also ICJ, United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran [1980] ICJ Rep 3, 39–40 [84]–[85] (describing espionage as an abuse of diplomatic functions under the VCDR).
- ↑ Art. 31 (1) VCDR.
- ↑ Art. 9 (1) VCDR.
- ↑ J D’Aspremont, ‘Persona Non Grata’, in R Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008) (updated January 2009): “Given that the reasons need not be given by the receiving State when declaring a diplomatic or consular agent of the sending State persona non grata, the declaration of a diplomatic agent as persona non grata is utterly discretionary. The receiving State may thus make use of it for various reasons, whether for the behaviour of the agent himself or due to the actions of the sending State.”
- ↑ United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, United States v Iran, Judgment, ICGJ 124 (ICJ 1980), 24 May 1980, paragraph 85.
- ↑ J D’Aspremont, ‘Persona Non Grata’, in R Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008) (updated January 2009), para. 16.