Breach of an international obligation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
m (fixed ASR and para) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[Category:Legal concepts]] |
[[Category:Legal concepts]] |
||
[[Category:Breach of an international obligation]] |
Latest revision as of 14:55, 15 October 2022
Definition[edit | edit source]
Breach of an international obligation |
---|
It is impossible to provide a list of all international obligations that may be violated by resort to cyber means. However, certain rules appear with higher frequency than others. These include the prohibition on the use of force; the prohibition of intervention; the obligation to respect the sovereignty of other States; the obligation to respect the right to privacy; the obligation of due diligence; and a few others (such as, for instance, the rule of distinction in the context of the law of armed conflict). |
Appendixes[edit | edit source]
See also[edit | edit source]
Notes and references[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Cf. ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 2(b).
- ↑ For a detailed discussion of a breach of an international obligation by a cyber-related act, see rule 14 of Tallinn Manual 2.0 and commentary 2–11 thereto.
- ↑ ILC Articles on State Responsibility, General commentary, para 1.
- ↑ Statute of the International Court of Justice, of 26 June 1945, annexed to the UN Charter, Art 38(1)(a)–(c).
- ↑ ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 2, para 10.
- ↑ ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 2, para 9.