Main Page: Difference between revisions

From International cyber law: interactive toolkit
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
(added new incidents (18-20))
m (removed incident 16)
Line 88: Line 88:


In the Toolkit, [[Scenario 14: Ransomware campaign|Scenario 14]] explores the legal questions regarding ransomware extortion campaigns. Given the indirect involvement of a State, [[Scenario 06: Cyber countermeasures against an enabling State|Scenario 06]] deals with the possible countermeasures deployed against an enabling State. [[Scenario 20: Cyber operations against medical facilities|Scenario 20]] focuses on cyber operations against medical facilities.
In the Toolkit, [[Scenario 14: Ransomware campaign|Scenario 14]] explores the legal questions regarding ransomware extortion campaigns. Given the indirect involvement of a State, [[Scenario 06: Cyber countermeasures against an enabling State|Scenario 06]] deals with the possible countermeasures deployed against an enabling State. [[Scenario 20: Cyber operations against medical facilities|Scenario 20]] focuses on cyber operations against medical facilities.
</div>
</option>
<option>
<!-- INCIDENT 16-->
<div id="mp-itn" style="padding:0.1em 0.6em;">[[File:Emblem of the African Union.svg|left|150px]]
The first sign of an [[African Union headquarters hack (2020)|malicious cyber activity targeting the headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa]] was spotted in January 2020. The suspected actor is the "Bronze President", a hacker group allegedly residing in China. The perpetrators obtained data from the headquarters’ IT system. The data was only transmitted during work hours, which concealed it in the regular data stream. China distanced itself from the activity claiming the incident was supposed to damage Sino-African relations.

In the context of the incident, the main issue is the responsibility of the host State for providing the security of the international organisation, which is developed in [[Scenario 04: A State’s failure to assist an international organization|Scenario 04]].
</div>
</div>
</option>
</option>
Line 216: Line 208:
<div id="mp-itn" style="padding:0.1em 0.6em;">[[File:Brno_(znak).svg|left|150px]]
<div id="mp-itn" style="padding:0.1em 0.6em;">[[File:Brno_(znak).svg|left|150px]]
On 13 March 2020, Brno University Hospital, the second-largest hospital in the Czech Republic, at the time also providing COVID-19 testing capacities, was [[Brno University Hospital ransomware attack (2020)|targeted by ransomware]]. The hospital was forced to shut down its entire IT network, postpone urgent surgical interventions, and reroute patients to other nearby hospitals. It took several weeks before the hospital was fully operational again. [[Scenario 14: Ransomware campaign|Scenario 14]] in the Toolkit provides the legal analysis of a ransomware campaign against municipal and health care services abroad; [[Scenario 20: Cyber operations against medical facilities|Scenario 20]] and [[Scenario 23: Vaccine research and testing|Scenario 23]] both focus on various cyber operations against hospitals.</div>
On 13 March 2020, Brno University Hospital, the second-largest hospital in the Czech Republic, at the time also providing COVID-19 testing capacities, was [[Brno University Hospital ransomware attack (2020)|targeted by ransomware]]. The hospital was forced to shut down its entire IT network, postpone urgent surgical interventions, and reroute patients to other nearby hospitals. It took several weeks before the hospital was fully operational again. [[Scenario 14: Ransomware campaign|Scenario 14]] in the Toolkit provides the legal analysis of a ransomware campaign against municipal and health care services abroad; [[Scenario 20: Cyber operations against medical facilities|Scenario 20]] and [[Scenario 23: Vaccine research and testing|Scenario 23]] both focus on various cyber operations against hospitals.</div>
</option>
<option>
<!-- INCIDENT 16-->
<div id="mp-itn" style="padding:0.1em 0.6em;">[[File:Emblem of the African Union.svg|left|150px]]
The first sign of an [[African Union headquarters hack (2020)|malicious cyber activity targeting the headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa]] was spotted in January 2020. The suspected actor is the "Bronze President", a hacker group allegedly residing in China. The perpetrators obtained data from the headquarters’ IT system. The data was only transmitted during work hours, which concealed it in the regular data stream. China distanced itself from the activity claiming the incident was supposed to damage Sino-African relations.

In the context of the incident, the main issue is the responsibility of the host State for providing the security of the international organisation, which is developed in [[Scenario 04: A State’s failure to assist an international organization|Scenario 04]].
</div>
</option>
</option>
END OF REMOVED INCIDENTS -->
END OF REMOVED INCIDENTS -->

Revision as of 15:28, 14 June 2022

Welcome to the Cyber Law Toolkit, an interactive online resource on international law and cyber operations.
On 29 January 2020, The New Humanitarian reported that dozens of servers were “compromised” at the United Nations offices in Geneva and Vienna. The attack dated back to July 2019 and affected staff records, health insurance, and commercial contract data. According to an unnamed UN official cited in an Associated Press report on the same day, the level of sophistication was so high that it was possible a State-backed actor might have been behind it. Within the Toolkit, Scenario 04 specifically considers a hypothetical situation in which an international organization falls victim to cyber attacks, the impact of which could and should have been averted by the host State.

</option> <option>

On 30 July 2020, the Council of the European Union decided to impose restrictive measures against six individuals and three entities considered to be responsible for or involved in various hostile cyber operations. These included the attempted hack of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and the WannaCry and NotPetya incidents. The sanctions imposed included a travel ban and an asset freeze. In addition, EU persons and entities were prohibited from making funds available to those listed. This was the first time the EU has imposed restrictive measures of this kind. Within the Toolkit, Scenario 04 specifically considers a hypothetical situation in which an international organization falls victim to cyber attacks, and Scenario 17 discusses the legality of targeted restrictive measures of this kind from the perspective of international law.

</option> <option>

On 13 March 2020, Brno University Hospital, the second-largest hospital in the Czech Republic, at the time also providing COVID-19 testing capacities, was targeted by ransomware. The hospital was forced to shut down its entire IT network, postpone urgent surgical interventions, and reroute patients to other nearby hospitals. It took several weeks before the hospital was fully operational again. Scenario 14 in the Toolkit provides the legal analysis of a ransomware campaign against municipal and health care services abroad; Scenario 20 and Scenario 23 both focus on various cyber operations against hospitals.

</option> <option>

The first sign of an malicious cyber activity targeting the headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa was spotted in January 2020. The suspected actor is the "Bronze President", a hacker group allegedly residing in China. The perpetrators obtained data from the headquarters’ IT system. The data was only transmitted during work hours, which concealed it in the regular data stream. China distanced itself from the activity claiming the incident was supposed to damage Sino-African relations.

In the context of the incident, the main issue is the responsibility of the host State for providing the security of the international organisation, which is developed in Scenario 04.

</option> END OF REMOVED INCIDENTS -->