User contributions for Reviewer793
A user with 12 edits. Account created on 15 October 2018.
8 February 2019
- 14:0814:08, 8 February 2019 diff hist +192 Talk:Scenario 03: Cyber operation against the power grid No edit summary
- 13:5913:59, 8 February 2019 diff hist +239 Scenario 03: Cyber operation against the power grid →Legal analysis: This scenario avoided the use of force classification - we think it should be mentioned (to limited extent). What kind of damage would count towards use of force classificaton etc. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:4513:45, 8 February 2019 diff hist +182 m Scenario 03: Cyber operation against the power grid →Facts: we believe it is importatn to distinguish beween critical and non-critical systems in company X, hence the change. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:3813:38, 8 February 2019 diff hist +437 Talk:Scenario 03: Cyber operation against the power grid →=
- 13:3413:34, 8 February 2019 diff hist +417 Talk:Scenario 03: Cyber operation against the power grid No edit summary
- 13:2513:25, 8 February 2019 diff hist +263 Talk:Scenario 03: Cyber operation against the power grid No edit summary
- 12:1712:17, 8 February 2019 diff hist +137 m Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons →Legal analysis: RULE 104, PARa 6 on p. 455 of TM 2.0 Tag: Visual edit
- 12:1012:10, 8 February 2019 diff hist +227 Talk:Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons →Comments of reviewer
- 11:5311:53, 8 February 2019 diff hist +9 m Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons →Keywords: Stuxnet as an eye-catcher and descriptor/generic terms for a class of cyber-physical attacks Tag: Visual edit
- 10:3710:37, 8 February 2019 diff hist 0 m Bibliography Albrecgr Randelzhofer corrected to Albrecht Randelzhofer Tag: Visual edit
23 November 2018
- 10:1810:18, 23 November 2018 diff hist +655 Talk:Scenario 08: Certificate authority hack →Comments of reviewer: new section
- 09:5509:55, 23 November 2018 diff hist +3,159 Talk:Scenario 10: Legal review of cyber weapons →Comments of reviewer: new section